Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-22 22:44:15
> Back to your function - perhaps taking unqualified template parameter
> is not the best idea, and if you want to take a range you might want to
> be bit more explicit about it? E.g. like this:
> template<typename T1, typename T2>
> void modifies_range(boost::joined_range<T1, T2> && rng);
> I hope users of such "modifies_range" function would find nothing to
> complain about such an interface.
Unfortunately, the reference collapsing no longer works in this case,
so this function will not accept an lvalue joined_range.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk