Subject: Re: [boost] Slow Bugs Tracker
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-23 08:18:45
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Hi Beman,
>> Trac (performance) isn't good, we'd like to replace it with Redmine.
>> Is the steering committe ok with this?
> The steering committee would need a short proposal document that lays
> out the motivation for a change, the pros and cons of Redmine vs Trac,
> and how the transition would be accomplished. Plus a few links to
> relevant info. That will give the SC something specific to vote on.
> Personally, Redmine seems a good choice, but I've a couple of concerns:
> IIUC, performance is a major motivation. A quick try with google found
> many assertions that Redmine was faster than Trac, but no actual
> performance measurements. Has performance actually been measured?
> I also came across a case where someone moved from Trac to Redmine,
> then moved back again a year later because they weren't familiar
> enough with Ruby on Rails, and that caused them admin problems. Is
> that also a likely problem for Boost?
What has been done already?
Performance analysis of current situation?
What other issue tracker improvement requests exist?
IIRC Dave came up with Redmine. Was this discussed already? Might
another tracker / solution be better?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk