Subject: Re: [boost] DCVS vs CVS: call for constructivism
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-26 18:15:08
On 3/26/2012 4:37 AM, Philippe Vaucher wrote:
>> What is "far from ideal (if not horrible)" about the current situation
>> with Boost and SVN ? Please be specific.
> I think the discussions have shown that it's hard to be specific and
> convincing about this topic, but see the list of pros/cons I made in my
> original post and also the posts from Beman and Julian.
> You won't find individual points where DCVS seem to really
> outperform/outfeature the classic CVS, but together as a whole it really
> makes a difference for a lot of people. I agree that "horrible" is probably
> too far streched, sorry for that... but I think the current situation
> frustrates people, and it eventually gets on their nerves.
This is my point about the move from a CVS like SVN to a DVCS like Git (
or Mercurial ). I really do not understand the necessity for it based on
use cases which are causing people to feel that a change should be made.
I do hear general reasons why some people are more comfortable with a
DVCS but since switching is going to cause me to have to learn a new set
of techniques for working with version control and Boost libraries,
while I am already quite comfortable with the current SVN system and its
capabilities, you can understand why I do not see the reason for having
to make this change.
Simply saying that X is better because of some general reasons, which do
not apply IMO to actual usage. does not make me want to do something
different in programming and programming tools.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk