Subject: Re: [boost] DCVS vs CVS: call for constructivism
From: Martin Geisler (mg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-28 09:23:43
Philippe Vaucher <philippe.vaucher_at_[hidden]> writes:
Thanks for a good discussion about DVCS. Since the discussion seems to
have quiet down, I'll unsubscribe again in a couple of days.
I hope I could help answer some questions about what DVCS brings to the
table and explain some of the common misunderstandings. Feel free to Cc
me in the future if there is anything I can help with.
Good luck with the project!
> I think we all know understood that there are people from both camps,
> some with emotional arguments, some with constructive arguments, but
> it's not really moving anywhere. We need to start listing what would
> have to be done and once we have such a map see if it's worth it
> before discussing pointless things.
-- Martin Geisler aragost Trifork Professional Mercurial support http://www.aragost.com/mercurial/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk