Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] adaptors vs. rvalue to lvalue& binding
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-02 10:49:13

on Mon Mar 26 2012, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:

> On 3/24/2012 4:14 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> on Fri Mar 23 2012, Thorsten Ottosen<thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/23/2012 4:20 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One possibility:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - make adaptor expressions return const rvalues. The const rvalues will
>>>>>      bind to T&   arguments (where T is a template parameter) by deducing T
>>>>>      to be const.
>>>
>>> I don't like this one.
>>
>> and your specific objection is...?
>
> well, it would require the other solution as well before it works. So
> the other solution is simpler.

Sorry, what other solution would it require?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com