Subject: Re: [boost] Metaprogram benchmarks
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-04 12:08:08
on Tue Apr 03 2012, Sumant Tambe <sutambe-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Some compile-time computations can be better (faster) implemented as
> recursive constexpr functions. I would like to see some performance
> comparisons between constexpr and vanilla metaprogramming.
Well, yes, that's the point. The question is, what kinds of
computations should we try to perform in order to discover where to use
the new techniques?
Do we have libraries in Boost with slow-to-compile examples that would
make good representative test cases?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk