Subject: Re: [boost] [fixed_point] Request for interest in a binary fixed point library
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-11 18:29:06
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> I understand that providing access to the underlying type open possible
> extensions, but the internals would be quite complex when managing
> chunks of words. Should the library be limited to builtin underlying
> types without chunks?
builtin underlying types is sufficient for anything I've ever needed. If I ever
need >64 bits, I can always resort to chunking myself. If chunking can be
implemented without substantial cost, then go for it. But, I don't want to pay
for what I don't use.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk