Subject: Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] char types and UDTs
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-12 08:24:54
12.04.2012 15:20 "Mathias Gaunard" <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]>:
> Why is lexical_cast so complicated and full and quirks?
> All that stuff looks messy and over-engineered.
That was an example of lexical_cast with all the wishes implemented.
Current implementation is simple, and user only required to provide stream
operators << and >> to work with it.
-- Best regards, Antony Polukhin
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk