Subject: Re: [boost] [Variant] C++11 variadic template implementation
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-15 10:02:06
On 15/04/12 15:02, paul Fultz wrote:
> Well you can expand the parameter pack to create a static array of
> function pointers.
I see, interesting.
How does it fare in terms of bloat and performance? Are compilers still
able to inline with this?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk