Re: [boost] [function] The cost of boost::function

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] The cost of boost::function
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-16 19:09:39

On 4/17/12 6:42 AM, Michael Kochetkov wrote:
>> Unless, you have a better way to achieve the effect, I feel your criticism
> is
>> rather unfair.
> No doubt I had. It was BBBB but you have skipped it.

BBBB is not a universal replacement for AAAAA. For example, you can't
store BBBB in a class member or change/re-assign another function with
the same signature anytime, etc. So.. apples and oranges.

Regards,
-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://boost-spirit.com