Re: [boost] [concept_check] addable

Subject: Re: [boost] [concept_check] addable
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-23 12:52:28

Dave Abrahams wrote
> 
> Actually it checks that there exists an operator+ from T non-const
> lvalue x T non-const lvalue to U, where U is convertible to T const&
> 

Got it. That works for me but I might change the T non-const lvalue to T
const&. For curiosity, is there a way to program the concept ruling out the
implicit conversion from U to T const&?

>> maybe the Sun's linker errors below are from something else (I've
>> changed a regression test to get more info when it cycles tomorrow).
> 
> I don't know, but it seems unlikely.  Probably Sun's linker just needs a
> body for return_type().
> 

Indeed that was the case :(

--Lorenzo

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-concept-check-addable-tp4572138p4581042.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.