Subject: Re: [boost] [function] The cost of boost::function
From: Julien Nitard (julien.nitard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-27 10:59:39
> A bit late but FWIW...
> ...Boost.Function and its 'bloatware' problems are a regular topic on this
> list. There have been many proposals but near-zero response from the
> mantainer(s). I've made a major rewrite that solves most of the problems
> (lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2010/10/172593.php) so you can try it out if
> it helps ;)
An interesting read
What happened to the variadic templates-enabled
version of boost::function ? And why did the thread stop ? Looks like
something you could push for a review already ? Or did you lose
interest is because of the rather fast adoption of C++11 compilers
that ships an std::function ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk