Subject: Re: [boost] question about C++11 guidelines
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-03 02:15:19
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Say I'm rewriting an existing Boost library and targeting C++11
>> users. I plan to ship C++03 and C++11 versions of my library
>> side-by-side, so back-compat isn't an issue for the new code. Is
>> there a reason to prefer using Boost's versions of utilities like
>> enable_if, type traits, integral constant wrappers (e.g. mpl::int_),
>> tuples, etc., over the now-standard ones?
>> I'm leaning toward using std:: where I can, and falling back on
>> Boost's versions only when there is a compelling reason.
> Isn't easier to just use the boost versions knowing that they
> will be implemented in the most efficient/appropriate way
> for the compiler in question?
Although I wouldn't be so sure about the "most efficient/appropriate"
part, I would still use boost for several reasons. This is the code
we're in control of (so if there are bugs we can fix them ASAP), we
know how it works (i.e. potential pitfalls and advantages) and it's
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk