Subject: Re: [boost] [dynamic_bitset] Endianess and Adaption Vs Copying
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-03 17:18:28
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Phil Endecott
>> At minimum, the bit-ordering imposed by dynamic-bitset should be
>> explicitly documented.
> The BIT ordering? No, bit ordering is always the same. You never need to
> re-order the bits within a byte.
> (What am I missing?)
Bit ordering between bytes?
Or byte ordering?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk