Re: [boost] [dynamic_bitset] Endianess and Adaption Vs Copying

Subject: Re: [boost] [dynamic_bitset] Endianess and Adaption Vs Copying
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-03 17:18:28

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Phil Endecott
<spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> At minimum, the bit-ordering imposed by dynamic-bitset should be
>> explicitly documented.
>
>
> The BIT ordering?  No, bit ordering is always the same.  You never need to
> re-order the bits within a byte.
>
> (What am I missing?)

Bit ordering between bytes?
Or byte ordering?
-- 
Olaf