Subject: Re: [boost] question about C++11 guidelines
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-04 04:18:44
>IMO, every Boost library that has a counterpart in the standard should
>comply with the standard as much as possible and should use the standard
>whenever it is possible (that is the class/function is available and the
>library don't introduce extensions on them). Any deviation from the
>standard could be seen as a defect and should either be fixed or described
>explicitly as a limitation on the documentation.
If we do that then those libraries will wither and die, Boost authors should
be able to continue to enhance and expand capability, possibly with a view
towards the *next* standard. Besides just because the standard reflects
best practice right now, that doesn't mean that future tricks won't come
along that improve things further.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk