Subject: Re: [boost] Latest version and status of lockfree
From: Tim Blechmann (tim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-06 07:44:33
>>>> repo was done more than 6 month ago.
>>>> Now that atomic has been accepted, are there any roadblocks to have
>>>> boost.lockfree released ?
>>> boost.atomic has been accepted, but it hasn't been merged into trunk, yet
>>> ... helge, do you have any timeline?
>> I will package it up before the end of march, this should suffice?
any updates on boost.atomic?
otherwise, i'd consider merging boost.lockfree into trunk, although it
would require using g++-4.7 or clang++-3.1 in c++11 mode ...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk