Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-08 08:39:12
Dave Abrahams wrote
> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository. If library authors
> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.
ScopeExit, LocalFunction, Utility/IdentityType, and
Functional/OverloadedFunction look good.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Modularization-did-we-get-it-right-tp4617243p4617345.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk