Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 08:34:49
> Most software packages require some kind of installation process. For
> Boost, it has been the "Getting started" process documented on the web
> site. With modularization, some of the details of "Getting Started"
> will change. Why are you concerned that some of those installation
> process details ensures that user and developer scripts and setups
> continue to work?
I've had a lot of trouble to get boost.build+bjam to compile the assembler code from boost.context.
I'm annoyed that I get some additonal burden to re-write this stuff for the new build env again because the old one will not work with the modularized boost.
I think this is not a good migration strategy.
-- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk