Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-09 12:10:04

on Wed May 09 2012, "Oliver Kowalke" <oliver.kowalke-AT-gmx.de> wrote:

>> > The headers are moved into directory'include' - how does the build
>> system handle includes (header from other boost libs)?
>> > At least I get error that header xyz is not found if I execute the tests
>> using bjam.
>> 
>> You either use a build system setup that adds every directory to the 
>
> so that means that the new build env does not work out of the box?!
> what about libs using boost.move or boost.utils ...
>
>> include path or you run a script that generates flattened headers.
>
> nonsense

Relax, please.  This is not meant to be a final rendition.  Everything
will work seamlessly when it's done; we're just trying to get input
about the module boundaries.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com