Subject: Re: [boost] [ot] choosing a build system
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 06:26:14
On 09/05/12 02:54, Nathan Ridge wrote:
> I had originally planned to use Boost.Build, because I figured that
> it would be particularly suitable for a C++ library, and because
> I've come to associate Boost with high quality and excellence.
> However, recently I've heard talk of Boost switching its own build
> system from Boost.Build to CMake (in fact, the currently active
> thread about modularization suggests that this change is imminent).
For all I know, this is merely a marketing trick employed by vocal CMake proponents.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk