Re: [boost] [ot] choosing a build system

Subject: Re: [boost] [ot] choosing a build system
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-10 15:58:12

> From: beren.minor+boost_at_[hidden]
>
> [...]
>
> I think Boost.Build and CMake are at a totally different level of
> abstraction: CMake is low-level when Boost.Build is high-level.
>
> [...]
> 
> Boost.Build suffers from lack of documentation
> and lack of popularity

So is there something that's high-level *and* well-documented/widely
used?

Thanks,
Nate