Subject: Re: [boost] C++ Standards Committee membership for Boost?
From: Michel Morin (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-13 01:54:56
Nathan Ridge wrote:
> Not everyone agrees with the closed nature of the committee mailing lists.
> I for one think that since C++ is an open standard, the standard's development
> should happen completely in the open, too - that is, everyone should have read
> access to the committee mailing lists.
Allowing read access for everyone is a good idea!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk