Re: [boost] [type_erasure] RFC: New version

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] RFC: New version
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-14 08:57:32

AMDG

On 05/14/2012 05:21 AM, lcaminiti wrote:
> 
> Boost.Generic claims to support the following (but perhaps Matt is no longer
> developing this library): 
> Associate Types -- Yes

Yes.

> Associate Functions -- Yes 

Yes.

> Multi-type Concepts -- Yes 

Yes.

> Concept Maps -- Yes

Yes.

> Archetypes -- Yes 

N/A, although any<Concept, Tag> can act like
an archetype.

> Concept Refinement -- Yes 

Yes.

> Typename Deduction -- Yes 

I'm not sure exactly what this means.

> Concept-Based Overloading -- Almost

N/A.

> 
> How much of this can your library do?
> 

My library can do everything that's meaningful
for a dynamic library as opposed to static
concept checking.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe