Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-15 10:30:36
On 05/15/2012 07:15 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 05/11/2012 07:36 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>> on Fri May 11 2012, Beman Dawes <bdawes-AT-acm.org> wrote:
>>>> "Copy the leaves" if all else fails has the advantage of preserving
>>>> existing uses (like HTML links) that won't be followed with a dummy
>>>> forwarding #include. It may well be faster to use.
> Why not symlinks. I've had really good results with the symlink
> approach. Did I miss something?
Beman Dawes <bdawes-AT-acm.org> wrote:
> "Copy the leaves" *if all else fails*
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk