Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.50.0] RELEASE BRANCH REOPENED
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-23 07:54:21

Olaf van der Spek-3 wrote
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:25 AM, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti@> wrote:
>> It would be for ScopeExit, LocalFunction, OverloadedFunction, and
>> IdentityType because these libraries have been ready for a while
>> (regression
>> tested on all compilers, reviewed by managers and other library authors,
>> etc). I didn't merge them into release simply because I was think I still
>> had time and I had been busy at work in the last 2 weeks (I and Vicente
>> asked for a 1.50 release date a few times more than 3 weeks ago but got
>> no
>> answer, not the release was closed the same day it was announced). I put
>> a
>> lot of effort into getting these libraries ready, they are ready, not to
>> include them in 1.50 because of a miss-communication invalidates a large
>> part of the effort I put into developing and testing this libraries...
> Isn't that exaggerated? They could go into 1.51.

My point is that a truly put a lot of effort to meet the 1.50 target and
that is slipping away for miss-communication, which is rather unfortunate.


View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at