|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-30 18:05:57
On 29 May 2012 16:57, Simonson, Lucanus J <lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
>>IMO DuckTyping is an ill-defined term that is sometimes used to hide a multitude of sins.
>
> Yes, after making that post I thought about it a little more and decided I don't know how to define duck typing, but I know it when I see it.
How about structural typing?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk