Subject: [boost] [git/modularization] Suggested names for branches?
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-03 21:18:19
At the C++Now! session discussing moving to git and modularization, I
showed the usual git flow overview graphic from
http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ showing the
workflow for a library.
Someone (Dave?) mentioned that the git flow choices for branch names
were not what we would like for Boost. I agree, but don't recall the
exact suggestions for more appropriate names.
The three branches in question, with the git-flow names in parens,
were the main development branch (develop), release prep branches (?),
and the branch with actual releases (master).
Is there a better usual convention for these names? I have a vague
memory of someone mentioning "master" for the main development branch,
"release" for the branch with the actual releases, and maybe
"beta-x.xx.x" for release prep branches.
To try to avoid an extended bicycle shed discussion, perhaps people
could mention names they have actually seen used and know worked well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk