Subject: Re: [boost] [git/modularization] Suggested names for branches?
From: Brian Schrom (brian.schrom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-04 12:27:39
On 06/04/2012 09:14 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> That would be more conventional. It's an open question whether we're
> better off changing to the names that are the defaults (and
> documented) by git-flow, or we're better off choosing names that
> non-git-flow-ers will more easily recognize.
As a new user to a technology, it is sure nice when the defaults do the
right thing out of the box without having to consult detailed documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk