Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-07 17:37:08


AMDG

On 06/07/2012 01:27 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>
> on Thu Jun 07 2012, Nevin Liber <nevin-AT-eviloverlord.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7 June 2012 13:41, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In a nutshell, concept-based-runtime-polymorphism/type-erasure allows
>>> you to have runtime polymorphism while preserving value semantics. The
>>> value of that win is very commonly underestimated.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> So, is there a language feature that could be added to C++17 that would
>> make implementing type erasure easier?
>
> Yes; concepts :-)
>

I don't see how concepts would help.
Concepts would allow you to check the
requirements, but I don't think there's
any way to build a vtable from a concept
definition.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk