Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure

Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-07 19:05:10

On 7 June 2012 16:14, lcaminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> What if this were possible? Would this be an acceptable way to add custom
> concepts?
>
> BOOST_TYPE_ERASURE_CONCEPT(
>    concept (sable) ( class S )
>    (
>        void member_body(S, f) ( void ) ,
>        void member_body(S, g) ( void ) ,
>        void member_body(S, h) ( void )
>    )
> )
>

It would certainly help a lot.  If we want people to replace the common
idiom of creating AbstractS and storing the instantiated object in
unique_ptr<AbstractS> (or a different smart pointer), the replacement needs
to be almost as easy, at least for that very common case.
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]