Subject: Re: [boost] rvalue ref best practices?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-12 12:13:50
On 06/12/2012 06:02 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Mon Jun 11 2012, "Simonson, Lucanus J"<lucanus.j.simonson-AT-intel.com> wrote:
>>> In C++03, func_modify() would be the choice of performance-conscious
>>> In C++11, as we've told that "return by value is free" and the syntax
>>> is more elegant, I'm afraid everyone will write "func_factory".
>>> And func_factory() is less efficient when used in loops and other
>>> situations where resource reusing is essential.
>> If you aren't in a loop you probably don't care about performance. I
>> know I intend to stick with pass by reference. It is very useful to
>> clearly understand and be able to easily reason about the ownership of
>> resources in a program.
> If that's your primary concern, why on earth wouldn't you use
On a slightly unrelated note, let me add that for fundamental types,
pass-by-value is also performance critical when functions aren't inlined.
In a loop, it is often very important to avoid going through the stack
and to keep as much as possible in registers.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk