Re: [boost] rvalue ref best practices?

Subject: Re: [boost] rvalue ref best practices?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-15 13:41:32

On 15/06/2012 18:02, Dave Abrahams wrote:

> Most people don't know what "most objects" are like :-)

The copy and swap idiom is usually what's used for non-containers.

>
>> It doesn't seem a good idea to introduce a new function overloading
>> mechanism to drop that would always void this guarantee.
>
> I don't understand this sentence.

Some words were left when I was rewriting it.

It doesn't seem a good idea to introduce a new function overloading 
mechanism that would always void this guarantee.

This is referring to Ion's idea for a language extension.