Subject: Re: [boost] rvalue ref best practices?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-15 13:41:32
On 15/06/2012 18:02, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> Most people don't know what "most objects" are like :-)
The copy and swap idiom is usually what's used for non-containers.
>> It doesn't seem a good idea to introduce a new function overloading
>> mechanism to drop that would always void this guarantee.
> I don't understand this sentence.
Some words were left when I was rewriting it.
It doesn't seem a good idea to introduce a new function overloading
mechanism that would always void this guarantee.
This is referring to Ion's idea for a language extension.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk