|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review (June 8th - 17th, 2012)
From: Keith Burton (kb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-17 09:25:58
>> The review of Multiprecision is due to end on Sunday, June 17th, 2012,
but
>> AFAIK we only have two (very detailed and informative!) formal reviews so
>> far, which I fear is not enough to establish community consensus for
>> acceptance. I want to encourage more reviews from the community. If
anyone
>> would like to extend the review deadline to give himself or herself more
>> time to look at the library, discuss it, and/or write a review, please
let
>> me know!
>
> Relating to that it would be useful to know if the lack of reviews is due
> to:
>
> 1) No time.
> 2) No interest.
> 3) Don't like the library but are too polite to say so ;-)
> 4) Doesn't address the specific use case you're interested in.
> Many thanks, John.
I have written extended integer classes which have been used in commercial
software.
I have read all the discussion on multiprecision
Therefore I am sure I am not qualified to review the submission in any
detail.
However if I have a vote , it is for acceptance.
p.s. Add to John's list :
5) Know enough to know how little one knows about the problem domain.
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk