Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-18 07:24:23
Mathias Gaunard-2 wrote
> On 17/06/2012 12:45, Dirk Ulrich wrote:
>> I am working on a C++ based project which forbids the usage of C++
>> but it is still preferable to use Boost libraries at least the ones which
>> not make use of C++ exceptions at all.
> All Boost libraries should work with exceptions disabled, with
> potentially limited functionality. If that is not the case, it's
> probably a library-specific bug that should be reported.
I don't see this as a bug but as a nice to have feature. In addition, for
some libraries, the subset that could work with exceptions disabled could be
I agree however that a list of libraries that works with exceptions disabled
should be built as well as the ones with no-rtti. Anyway, we need some
testers that will run the regression test with the specific options. Any
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-and-exceptions-tp4631441p4631449.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk