Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: TypeErasure (docs, Concept Maps misnamed?)
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-21 13:34:38
On 06/21/12 09:38, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
>> On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> The page:
>> with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about
>> specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything
>> in that section about a map.
> a) This applies to any concept, not just
> builtin ones.
> b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for
uses the term 'primitive concept':
A primitive concept must be a specialization of a class template,
with a static member function called apply.
What's the difference between a 'Concept Map' and 'primitive concept'?
If they are the same, why not use the same term for both?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk