Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-24 07:49:01

On 24.06.2012, at 01:33, Robert Ramey wrote:
> 
> But this facility is included in the same library as another facility
> useful to users.  So addressing of one problem - non-conforming
> compilers is not orthogonal to the other problem - helpful facilities
> for users.  It's not fine grained enough for my taste.

They're not non-conforming. They're just not C++11-enabled. There's a big difference.

Sebastian