Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-24 07:49:01
On 24.06.2012, at 01:33, Robert Ramey wrote:
> But this facility is included in the same library as another facility
> useful to users. So addressing of one problem - non-conforming
> compilers is not orthogonal to the other problem - helpful facilities
> for users. It's not fine grained enough for my taste.
They're not non-conforming. They're just not C++11-enabled. There's a big difference.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk