Subject: Re: [boost] Trimming Dependencies (was Boost and exceptions)
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-24 10:18:53
on Sun Jun 24 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 June 2012 01:55, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> on Sat Jun 23 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That's pretty crazy. Do you know if separating test dependencies would
>>> make much of a difference?
>> They're already separated, along with documentation dependencies. Â You
>> *really* don't want to see the graph that includes the test dependencies
> OK, I assumed from the dependencies on Test that they were included,
> but some headers do depend on Test.
Yes, that's one of those libraries that has useful header-only parts
that could be separated from the parts that require a library binary.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk