Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review (June 8th - 17th, 2012)
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-24 19:53:29
On 06/24/2012 04:25 PM, Matthieu Schaller wrote:
> Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> If boost wants to move into the realm of extended precision numbers, then
What do you mean "If boost want to...?" There is
no way to determine this apart from the review process,
/which you are a part of by submitting a review/.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk