Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review (June 8th - 17th, 2012)

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review (June 8th - 17th, 2012)
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-24 19:53:29

AMDG

On 06/24/2012 04:25 PM, Matthieu Schaller wrote:
>  
>     Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> 
>  If boost wants to move into the realm of extended precision numbers, then
> yes.
> 

What do you mean "If boost want to...?"  There is
no way to determine this apart from the review process,
/which you are a part of by submitting a review/.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe