Subject: Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review (June 8th - 17th, 2012)
From: Matthieu Schaller (matthieu.schaller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-25 03:30:01
> >> Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> > If boost wants to move into the realm of extended precision numbers, then
> > yes.
> Matthieu, you need to say yes or no. The reviewers decide and
> it's Boolean.
Then, yes, it should be accepted.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk