Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION [was RE: Boost and exceptions]
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-26 13:02:47

Next message: Alex Perry: "Re: [boost] program options (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)"
Previous message: Nikolay Mladenov: "Re: [boost] [pool] Objects of varying sizes"
In reply to: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION [was RE: Boost and exceptions]"
Next in thread: Brian Wood: "Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions"

2012/6/26 Pete Bartlett <pete_at_[hidden]>:
> This thread has pushed me in the direction that this is the way to go. Here
> are some specific policy change proposals:
...

I would also advise to use BOOST_SYMBOL_VISIBLE for all the classes,
derived from std::exception. This can be enforced by Boost.Inspection.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin

Next message: Alex Perry: "Re: [boost] program options (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)"
Previous message: Nikolay Mladenov: "Re: [boost] [pool] Objects of varying sizes"
In reply to: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION [was RE: Boost and exceptions]"
Next in thread: Brian Wood: "Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk