Subject: Re: [boost] program options (consider using BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION)
From: Alex Perry (Alex.Perry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-27 06:59:52
Sebastian Redl on 26 June 2012 19:02 wrote :
> That would be PropertyTree, and I'll put changing that on my todo list. (I do use Boost.Exception, I think, but I'm not attaching information.)
That would be great thanks! - though my comment was not meant to criticize propertyTree in particular - it's a very useful library - was more trying to use an example to add weight to a general wish that exceptions for boost libraries were more consistent (and including information only available at throw site when applicable) - since this just makes using them even easier given the number of boost libraries that exist now.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk