Subject: Re: [boost] Policy proposal: All user-visible exceptions should be thrown through BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-29 02:53:39
Le 28/06/12 22:16, Emil Dotchevski a écrit :
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Brian Wood<woodbrian77_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I haven't found much on use cases in single threaded programs.
>> Do you have any links? I did find the following comment in some
>> code that uses exception_ptr.
> Any time when a failure can't be handled at the time it is reported, which
> usually involves asynchronous operations, which usually involves multiple
>> "The reason here is that construction/destruction of an exception_ptr
>> are not "cheap""
> Calling boost::throw_exception doesn't construct or destruct exception_ptr
> objects. Any use of boost::exception_ptr requires #including
Does the use of BOOST_THROW_EXCEPTION implies the use of exception_ptr?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk