Subject: Re: [boost] Macro fo rBOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_MAX_DIGITS10 or useBOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-11 12:20:45
>I have recently used BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST to act as a proxy for
> numeric_limits<T>:: max_digits10 (as correctly suggested by John Maddock).
> Do we need yet another new macro for this, say
> or continue to use BOOST_NO_NUMERIC_LIMITS_LOWEST as a proxy.
> I think the latter will suffice (despite its unfortunate name for this
> But I think an addition to the configuration macro reference docs would be
Actually, this is one C++11 macro that Marshall missed for renaming. Maybe
if we asked him nicely ;-) he would volunteer to rename this one to