Subject: Re: [boost] [pool] Calling all library designers: The future of Boost.Pool???
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-18 17:38:28
> Hopefully others will chime in here with their requirements as well.
> Cheers all, John.
Even though I can't use it due to lack of experience, I know what I would like.
* Small pools going all the way down to, say, tens of bytes, like 32 bytes.
* Near-zero overhead for creating static and stack-based pools.
* The ability to lodge my own near-zero overhead custom allocator in a pool without having two write the whole allocator.But maybe I don't know much about Boost.Pool yet.
Best regards, Chris.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk