Subject: [boost] [block_ptr] Update
From: Phil Bouchard (philippe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-29 13:53:35
It's been more than a year since a completed the block_ptr and it seems
as if more recent library are being reviewed first. This would suggest
the FIFO of the schedule is not followed.
I was just wondering since at the same time the reviewing of block_ptr
is cost / beneficial.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk