Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-29 18:36:04

On 7/29/2012 3:29 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> I strongly encourage you to
> consider the name Boost.ValueInterface or something more descriptive of
> the anticipated *usage* of your library, rather than how it's implemented.

Hit send too soon, sorry. Your library can also be thought of as adding
structural typing or duck typing to C++, so:

- Boost.(Structural|Duck)(Types|Interface(s)?)?

would all be fine, descriptive names for the library, IMO.

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com