Subject: Re: [boost] [block_ptr] Update
From: Brian Smith (bjs3141_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-31 13:34:11
On 7/30/12, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I just looked at http://www.boost.org/development/submissions.html and
> http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html and don't see any mention of who
> finds the review manager, so it's understandable that you misunderstood. It
> is your responsibility to secure a review manager. One is not assigned.
> Once you've found someone, you post a message to the Review Wizards asking
> them to accept your review manager. If accepted, your review manager and
> you must then agree on some dates for your review -- you'll want to avoid
> conflicts with currently scheduled reviews -- and submit them to the Review
On the page, http://www.boost.org/community/reviews.html, under the
REVIEW WIZARD heading, it says,
The Review Wizard coordinates the formal review schedule:
- Maintains a list of review manager volunteers, in the form of a
queue, so that
volunteers who least recently managed reviews become the prime candidates for
- When a formal review is requested for a library:
- Assign a review manager and suggests a schedule, after checking
email) availability of the volunteers at the top of review manager queue.
- Finalize the schedule, once the review manager verifies the
library is actually
ready for review.
- Resolve schedule slips or other issues with review managers and submitters.
I know that volunteer review managers put themselves forward for
certain libraries. Failing that I was expecting a review manager to be
assigned, unless of course the volunteer review manager list is empty.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk