Subject: Re: [boost] [forward_declare] Interest Inquiry toward Faster Compile Times
From: Daniel Larimer (dlarimer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-02 08:12:00
> I believe the general idea has been around for years . I wonder if a
> utility like this gets accepted to Boost. You have my interest.
> I think you can save a few more lines of code in the headers by separating
> some of the member functions of fwd (like the constructors and the
> destructor) into another header file, that will only get included in .cpp
There is a trade off between lines of code an 'number of files loaded'. But I think you are right it could be split out.
As I think of more features to add to fwd this becomes important. In my latest test I show how operators can be transparently supported.
fwd only solves the problem for some classes. Classes like std::string pose a bigger challenge because they cannot be forward declared even if all you want to use is a std::string* because it is really a template / typedef. My partial solution was to attempt a class that was 'reinterpret_castable' to std string.
Simply including <string> adds 4000+ lines of code to the build. Including my string.hpp adds 61 lines and is sufficient for 95% of the usage of std::string (I would finish out the interface to mirror most of std::string) leaving only a few edge cases. where std::string would be required. In the .cpp it would use the real string to implement everything.
>  http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/028.htm
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk