Subject: Re: [boost] [forward_declare] Interest Inquiry toward Faster Compile Times
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-02 13:43:42
On Thursday 02 August 2012 00:50:26 Daniel Larimer wrote:
> Simply including boost::aligned_storage adds 1600 lines of code to be
> processed, most of it totally irrelevant to the task of aligned storage. I
> would want to implement aligned storage with much less overhead.
> The primary goal is to accelerate compile times and including anything from
> boost::mpl (which alligned_storage does) starts to pile on the code.
If you can create a slim equivalent of aligned_storage, I think we could
simply replace the current implementation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk