Re: [boost] [forward_declare] Interest Inquiry toward Faster Compile Times

Subject: Re: [boost] [forward_declare] Interest Inquiry toward Faster Compile Times
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-02 13:43:42

On Thursday 02 August 2012 00:50:26 Daniel Larimer wrote:
> 
> Simply including boost::aligned_storage adds 1600 lines of code to be
> processed, most of it totally irrelevant to the task of aligned storage.  I
> would want to implement aligned storage with much less overhead.
> 
> The primary goal is to accelerate compile times and including anything from
> boost::mpl (which alligned_storage does) starts to pile on the code.

If you can create a slim equivalent of aligned_storage, I think we could 
simply replace the current implementation.