Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-03 16:49:52

Next message: Alain O Miniussi: "Re: [boost] Who maintains boost MPI?"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [typeof][implementation]why not use decltype or conditional expr?"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)"

Steven Watanabe wrote:

> The tests only cover the public interface.
> I'm not going to add specific tests of
> the implementation details.
>

You might want to re-consider this.

I find the "implementation tests" very useful for isolating issues on
compilers which are unavailable to me when looking at the test failure
matrix.

Robert Ramey

Next message: Alain O Miniussi: "Re: [boost] Who maintains boost MPI?"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [typeof][implementation]why not use decltype or conditional expr?"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)"
Next in thread: Paul A. Bristow: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] Review started (July 18-27, 2012)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk